5 Benefits of Flat vs Tall Organizational Structure
Flat vs tall organizational structure is a topic that many businesses are interested in, especially as they grow and expand. A flat organizational structure is one that has fewer levels of management and a short chain of command, while a tall organizational structure is one that has many levels of management and a long chain of command. Both types of structures have their advantages and disadvantages, depending on the size, culture, and goals of the organization.
In this article, we will explore some of the benefits of choosing a flat organizational structure over a tall one, based on the latest research and examples from successful companies.
Benefit 1: Faster communication and decision-making
One of the main benefits of a flat organizational structure is that it allows for faster communication and decision-making within the organization. Because there are fewer layers of hierarchy, information can flow more easily and directly from the top to the bottom and vice versa. This can make the organization more responsive to changes in the market, customer needs, or internal issues.
For example, Netflix is a company that has adopted a flat organizational structure, with only four levels of management between the CEO and the frontline employees. According to its culture document, Netflix values “freedom and responsibility” over “processes and control”. This means that employees are empowered to make decisions on their own, without having to wait for approval from multiple managers. This enables Netflix to innovate faster and deliver better products and services to its customers.
Benefit 2: Higher employee motivation and engagement
Another benefit of a flat organizational structure is that it can boost employee motivation and engagement. Because employees have more autonomy and responsibility in their work, they can feel more valued and trusted by the organization. They can also have more opportunities to learn new skills, take on new challenges, and express their creativity.
For example, Valve is a company that has adopted a flat organizational structure, with no formal managers or titles. According to its handbook for new employees, Valve encourages its employees to “pick whatever [project] makes them most excited”. This means that employees can choose what they want to work on, how they want to work on it, and who they want to work with. This fosters a culture of passion, collaboration, and innovation within the company.
Benefit 3: Lower costs and bureaucracy
A third benefit of a flat organizational structure is that it can reduce costs and bureaucracy within the organization. Because there are fewer managers to pay and fewer rules to follow, the organization can save money and resources that can be invested elsewhere. It can also avoid unnecessary delays, conflicts, or errors that may arise from having too many layers of authority or procedures.
For example, Zappos is a company that has adopted a flat organizational structure, with no traditional managers or job titles. According to its website, Zappos uses a system called “Holacracy”, which is “a way of running an organization that removes power from a management hierarchy and distributes it across clear roles”. This means that employees can self-organize into teams, set their own goals, and make their own decisions. This simplifies the organizational structure and eliminates the need for micromanagement or bureaucracy.
Benefit 4: Greater customer satisfaction and loyalty
A fourth benefit of a flat organizational structure is that it can enhance customer satisfaction and loyalty. Because employees have more authority and flexibility in their work, they can provide better service and solutions to their customers. They can also communicate more directly and effectively with their customers, without having to go through intermediaries or follow rigid protocols.
For example, Southwest Airlines is a company that has adopted a flat organizational structure, with only four levels of management between the CEO and the frontline employees. According to its website, Southwest Airlines empowers its employees to “do whatever it takes” to make their customers happy. This means that employees can go above and beyond their normal duties, such as singing songs, telling jokes, or giving gifts to their customers. This creates a positive and memorable experience for both the employees and the customers.
Benefit 5: More adaptability and innovation
A fifth benefit of a flat organizational structure is that it can increase adaptability and innovation within the organization. Because employees have more freedom and input in their work, they can experiment with new ideas, methods, or technologies. They can also learn from each other, share feedback, and collaborate across different functions or departments.
For example, Spotify is a company that has adopted a flat organizational structure, with no formal managers or titles. According to its engineering culture video series, Spotify organizes its employees into “squads”, which are small, cross-functional, and autonomous teams that work on specific features or projects. Each squad has its own mission, vision, and strategy, and can decide how to best achieve them. This allows Spotify to deliver new and improved products and services to its users faster and more frequently.
Flat vs. Tall Organizational Structures: A Statistical Analysis
Flat and tall organizational structures are two common ways of organizing a business. A flat structure has few levels of hierarchy, meaning that employees have more autonomy and responsibility, but also less supervision and promotion opportunities. A tall structure has many levels of hierarchy, meaning that employees have more support and clear career paths, but also less decision-making power and slower communication.
Global Demand for Flat and Tall Organizational Structures
According to a report by Deloitte, the global demand for flat organizational structures is increasing, especially in the technology sector. The report states that “flat organizations are more agile, innovative, and customer-centric than traditional hierarchies” . The report also cites examples of successful flat organizations, such as Netflix, Spotify, and Valve.
However, the global demand for tall organizational structures is not declining, especially in the public sector and large corporations. The report acknowledges that “tall organizations are more stable, efficient, and compliant than flat ones” . The report also mentions the benefits of tall organizations, such as clear roles, standardized processes, and formal training.
Therefore, the global demand for flat and tall organizational structures depends on the industry, size, and goals of the business. There is no one-size-fits-all solution for organizational design. Instead, businesses should adopt the structure that best suits their needs and challenges.
References:
https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/3380547.pdf
http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/grant/docs/07Shell.pdf
https://communities-innovation.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/Organizational-Structure-for-the-Twenty-first-Century-220619i.pdf
Tall vs. Flat Organizational Structures: Key Differences | Indeed.com
Tall and flat organisations – Structures – Higher Business management Revision – BBC Bitesize
Tall vs. Flat Organizational Structures in Management
Analytical Comparison of Flat and Vertical Organizational … – IISTE
https://www2.deloitte.com/global/en/pages/human-capital/articles/future-of-work-organizing-for-agility.html
